anti arhgap29 antibody Search Results


arhgap29  (Atlas Antibodies)
93
Atlas Antibodies arhgap29
Figure 2. Gene expression analysis un- covers dysregulation of members of the ARHGAP gene family in U251 cells, and sta- ble silencing of ARHGAP12 and <t>ARHGAP29</t> in U251 cells exerts distinct cytoskeletal re- arrangements (A and B) Representative immunofluorescence images of ARHGAP12 and ARHGAP29 expres- sion, untreated and after exposure to the GSK-3 inhibitor BIO (A), with quantification by total fluo- rescence (B). Student’s t test, *p < 0.05. Scale bar: 10 mm. Data presented as mean ± SEM. (C) Measurement of cellular localization showed loss of nuclear expression of both ARHGAP12 and ARHGAP29 following exposure to BIO. (D) Representative bright-field micrographs of collagen-embedded U251 spheroids immuno- stained for either ARHGAP12 or ARHGAP29 (brown) and counterstained with hematoxylin. Cytoplasmic labeling of ARHGAP12 in the spheroid core became more pronounced after BIO treatment (black arrowheads). For ARHGAP29, cytoplasmic and membranous labeling was noted, especially on the spheroid periphery and on migratory cells, which was reduced after treatment with BIO (red arrowheads). Scale bar: 50 mm. Data presented as median. (E) Stable gene silencing of ARHGAP12 (A12 kd) and ARHGAP29 (A29 kd) in U251 cells was confirmed by western blot. (F) Representative immunofluorescence of U251 cells with stable ARHGAP12 and ARHGAP29 kd showing morphological changes and cytoskeletal rearrangement in U251 cells in 2D monolayers. Scale bar: 100 mm. (G) Time-lapse microscopy of U251 cells with kd of the 2 different ARHGAPs showed distinct cellular morphological characteristics compared to control cells. Scale bar: 200 mm. (H) In 3D spheroid assays, over 72 h, shorter cell protrusions consisting of rounded cells for the ARHGAP29 kd and protrusions consisting of in- terconnected, elongated cells became evident. Scale bar: 100 mm. (I) 3D invasion assays highlight cellular features and morphological changes of migrating cells after ARHGHAP29 and ARHGAP12 kd. Scale bar: 200 mm.
Arhgap29, supplied by Atlas Antibodies, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/anti+arhgap29+antibody/pm40053455-233-41-43?v=Atlas+Antibodies
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
arhgap29 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-08
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
rabbit anti-human arhgap29 polyclonal antibody  (Cusabio)
N/A
Rabbit anti-Human ARHGAP29 Polyclonal Antibody
   Buy from Supplier
anti-arhgap29 monoclonal antibody  (Creative BioMart)
N/A
GTPase activator for the Rho-type GTPases by converting them to an inactive GDP-bound state. Has strong activity toward RHOA, and weaker activity toward RAC1 and CDC42. May act as a specific effector of RAP2A to
   Buy from Supplier
anti-arhgap29 (full length) polyclonal antibody  (Creative BioMart)
N/A
GTPase activator for the Rho-type GTPases by converting them to an inactive GDP-bound state. Has strong activity toward RHOA, and weaker activity toward RAC1 and CDC42. May act as a specific effector of RAP2A to
   Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


Figure 2. Gene expression analysis un- covers dysregulation of members of the ARHGAP gene family in U251 cells, and sta- ble silencing of ARHGAP12 and ARHGAP29 in U251 cells exerts distinct cytoskeletal re- arrangements (A and B) Representative immunofluorescence images of ARHGAP12 and ARHGAP29 expres- sion, untreated and after exposure to the GSK-3 inhibitor BIO (A), with quantification by total fluo- rescence (B). Student’s t test, *p < 0.05. Scale bar: 10 mm. Data presented as mean ± SEM. (C) Measurement of cellular localization showed loss of nuclear expression of both ARHGAP12 and ARHGAP29 following exposure to BIO. (D) Representative bright-field micrographs of collagen-embedded U251 spheroids immuno- stained for either ARHGAP12 or ARHGAP29 (brown) and counterstained with hematoxylin. Cytoplasmic labeling of ARHGAP12 in the spheroid core became more pronounced after BIO treatment (black arrowheads). For ARHGAP29, cytoplasmic and membranous labeling was noted, especially on the spheroid periphery and on migratory cells, which was reduced after treatment with BIO (red arrowheads). Scale bar: 50 mm. Data presented as median. (E) Stable gene silencing of ARHGAP12 (A12 kd) and ARHGAP29 (A29 kd) in U251 cells was confirmed by western blot. (F) Representative immunofluorescence of U251 cells with stable ARHGAP12 and ARHGAP29 kd showing morphological changes and cytoskeletal rearrangement in U251 cells in 2D monolayers. Scale bar: 100 mm. (G) Time-lapse microscopy of U251 cells with kd of the 2 different ARHGAPs showed distinct cellular morphological characteristics compared to control cells. Scale bar: 200 mm. (H) In 3D spheroid assays, over 72 h, shorter cell protrusions consisting of rounded cells for the ARHGAP29 kd and protrusions consisting of in- terconnected, elongated cells became evident. Scale bar: 100 mm. (I) 3D invasion assays highlight cellular features and morphological changes of migrating cells after ARHGHAP29 and ARHGAP12 kd. Scale bar: 200 mm.

Journal: Cell reports

Article Title: ARHGAP12 and ARHGAP29 exert distinct regulatory effects on switching between two cell morphological states through GSK-3 activity.

doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2025.115361

Figure Lengend Snippet: Figure 2. Gene expression analysis un- covers dysregulation of members of the ARHGAP gene family in U251 cells, and sta- ble silencing of ARHGAP12 and ARHGAP29 in U251 cells exerts distinct cytoskeletal re- arrangements (A and B) Representative immunofluorescence images of ARHGAP12 and ARHGAP29 expres- sion, untreated and after exposure to the GSK-3 inhibitor BIO (A), with quantification by total fluo- rescence (B). Student’s t test, *p < 0.05. Scale bar: 10 mm. Data presented as mean ± SEM. (C) Measurement of cellular localization showed loss of nuclear expression of both ARHGAP12 and ARHGAP29 following exposure to BIO. (D) Representative bright-field micrographs of collagen-embedded U251 spheroids immuno- stained for either ARHGAP12 or ARHGAP29 (brown) and counterstained with hematoxylin. Cytoplasmic labeling of ARHGAP12 in the spheroid core became more pronounced after BIO treatment (black arrowheads). For ARHGAP29, cytoplasmic and membranous labeling was noted, especially on the spheroid periphery and on migratory cells, which was reduced after treatment with BIO (red arrowheads). Scale bar: 50 mm. Data presented as median. (E) Stable gene silencing of ARHGAP12 (A12 kd) and ARHGAP29 (A29 kd) in U251 cells was confirmed by western blot. (F) Representative immunofluorescence of U251 cells with stable ARHGAP12 and ARHGAP29 kd showing morphological changes and cytoskeletal rearrangement in U251 cells in 2D monolayers. Scale bar: 100 mm. (G) Time-lapse microscopy of U251 cells with kd of the 2 different ARHGAPs showed distinct cellular morphological characteristics compared to control cells. Scale bar: 200 mm. (H) In 3D spheroid assays, over 72 h, shorter cell protrusions consisting of rounded cells for the ARHGAP29 kd and protrusions consisting of in- terconnected, elongated cells became evident. Scale bar: 100 mm. (I) 3D invasion assays highlight cellular features and morphological changes of migrating cells after ARHGHAP29 and ARHGAP12 kd. Scale bar: 200 mm.

Article Snippet: The following antibodies were used for immunocytochemistry studies and immunohistochemistry, Ki67 (1:5000, Abcam, Cambridge, UK; Cat # ab15580), Cleaved Caspase 3 (CC3) (1:100, Cell Signaling Technologies, New England, UK; Cat # D175), ARHGAP12 (1:200, Novus Biologicals, Cambridge, UK; Cat # NBP1-91678), ARHGAP29 (1:100, ATLAS Antibodies, Cambridge, UK; Cat # HPA026534), E-cadherin (1:100, Abcam, Cambridge, UK; Cat # ab1416), N-cadherin (1:100, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Heidelberg, Germany; Cat # Sc-59987), Vimentin (1:200, Abcam, Cambridge, UK; Cat # ab16700), Actin Cytoskeleton/Focal adhesion kit (1:500, Merck, Feltham, UK; Cat # FAK100).

Techniques: Gene Expression, Expressing, Staining, Labeling, Western Blot, Time-lapse Microscopy, Control

Figure 3. Stable silencing of ARHGAP12 or ARHGAP29 induces changes in the number of appendages emanating from spheroids and distance traveled away from spheroids by individual migratory cells Using Cloudbuster software,26 ARHGAP12 and ARHGAP29 kd cell spheroids were analyzed at time point 0 and at 48 h. (A) In U87 cells, ARHGAP29 kd spheroids showed reduced length of protrusions in comparison to ARHGAP12 (one-way ANOVA, p = 0.0002) but no difference in the number of extensions after 48 h (one-way ANOVA, p > 0.05). (B) For U251, a similar effect was seen after ARHGAP12 kd in the length of cellular protrusions compared to ARHGAP29 kd (p = 0.0016) after 48 h. Data presented as median, interquartile range. (C) Representative reconstructed spheroids and migratory cells treated with a non-target control, ARHGAP29 kd, or ARHGAP12 kd. Insets high- light a selected region of an individual spheroid with visible extensions and individual cells (white arrowheads) with (left to right) a non-target (NT) control spheroid, ARHGAP29 kd, and ARHGAP12 kd.

Journal: Cell reports

Article Title: ARHGAP12 and ARHGAP29 exert distinct regulatory effects on switching between two cell morphological states through GSK-3 activity.

doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2025.115361

Figure Lengend Snippet: Figure 3. Stable silencing of ARHGAP12 or ARHGAP29 induces changes in the number of appendages emanating from spheroids and distance traveled away from spheroids by individual migratory cells Using Cloudbuster software,26 ARHGAP12 and ARHGAP29 kd cell spheroids were analyzed at time point 0 and at 48 h. (A) In U87 cells, ARHGAP29 kd spheroids showed reduced length of protrusions in comparison to ARHGAP12 (one-way ANOVA, p = 0.0002) but no difference in the number of extensions after 48 h (one-way ANOVA, p > 0.05). (B) For U251, a similar effect was seen after ARHGAP12 kd in the length of cellular protrusions compared to ARHGAP29 kd (p = 0.0016) after 48 h. Data presented as median, interquartile range. (C) Representative reconstructed spheroids and migratory cells treated with a non-target control, ARHGAP29 kd, or ARHGAP12 kd. Insets high- light a selected region of an individual spheroid with visible extensions and individual cells (white arrowheads) with (left to right) a non-target (NT) control spheroid, ARHGAP29 kd, and ARHGAP12 kd.

Article Snippet: The following antibodies were used for immunocytochemistry studies and immunohistochemistry, Ki67 (1:5000, Abcam, Cambridge, UK; Cat # ab15580), Cleaved Caspase 3 (CC3) (1:100, Cell Signaling Technologies, New England, UK; Cat # D175), ARHGAP12 (1:200, Novus Biologicals, Cambridge, UK; Cat # NBP1-91678), ARHGAP29 (1:100, ATLAS Antibodies, Cambridge, UK; Cat # HPA026534), E-cadherin (1:100, Abcam, Cambridge, UK; Cat # ab1416), N-cadherin (1:100, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Heidelberg, Germany; Cat # Sc-59987), Vimentin (1:200, Abcam, Cambridge, UK; Cat # ab16700), Actin Cytoskeleton/Focal adhesion kit (1:500, Merck, Feltham, UK; Cat # FAK100).

Techniques: Software, Comparison, Control

Figure 4. ARHGAP transcription is regu- lated in part by GSK-3 signaling via b-cate- nin translocation (A) Immunofluorescence labeling with various markers (ARHGAP12, ARHGAP29, b-catenin, and CD44) of U251 cells treated with the GSK-3 in- hibitor BIO. ICG001 and inhibitor combination re- veals that ARHGAP12 and ARHGAP29 protein levels are altered after treatment with BIO and not affected by treatment with ICG001 alone or the combination treatment (n = 3/group). Scale bar: 200 mm. (B and C) Significant differences (mean ± SEM) in (B) CD44 expression and (C) b-catenin expression in cell populations treated with the GSK-3 inhibitor BIO, ICG001, or ICG001 in combination with the GSK-3 inhibitor BIO were observed (n = 3). Data presented as mean ± SEM. (D) Representative images from time-lapse mi- croscopy of U251 cells, showing changes in the position of cells over a 24-h period in untreated, BIO-treated, ICG001-treated, and combination treatment groups. Scale bar: 200 mm (E) Representative plots demonstrating the nega- tive effect of the GSK inhibitor BIO on cell migra- tion, with no effect of the inhibitor ICG001 and no effect after combination treatment. (F and G) Significant differences (mean ± SEM) in (F) ARHGAP12 and (G) ARHGAP29 expression in cell populations treated with the GSK-3 inhibitor BIO, ICG001, or ICG001 in combination with the GSK-3 inhibitor BIO were observed (n = 3). Data presented as mean ± SEM. Post hoc Dunnett’s test, *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.0001.

Journal: Cell reports

Article Title: ARHGAP12 and ARHGAP29 exert distinct regulatory effects on switching between two cell morphological states through GSK-3 activity.

doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2025.115361

Figure Lengend Snippet: Figure 4. ARHGAP transcription is regu- lated in part by GSK-3 signaling via b-cate- nin translocation (A) Immunofluorescence labeling with various markers (ARHGAP12, ARHGAP29, b-catenin, and CD44) of U251 cells treated with the GSK-3 in- hibitor BIO. ICG001 and inhibitor combination re- veals that ARHGAP12 and ARHGAP29 protein levels are altered after treatment with BIO and not affected by treatment with ICG001 alone or the combination treatment (n = 3/group). Scale bar: 200 mm. (B and C) Significant differences (mean ± SEM) in (B) CD44 expression and (C) b-catenin expression in cell populations treated with the GSK-3 inhibitor BIO, ICG001, or ICG001 in combination with the GSK-3 inhibitor BIO were observed (n = 3). Data presented as mean ± SEM. (D) Representative images from time-lapse mi- croscopy of U251 cells, showing changes in the position of cells over a 24-h period in untreated, BIO-treated, ICG001-treated, and combination treatment groups. Scale bar: 200 mm (E) Representative plots demonstrating the nega- tive effect of the GSK inhibitor BIO on cell migra- tion, with no effect of the inhibitor ICG001 and no effect after combination treatment. (F and G) Significant differences (mean ± SEM) in (F) ARHGAP12 and (G) ARHGAP29 expression in cell populations treated with the GSK-3 inhibitor BIO, ICG001, or ICG001 in combination with the GSK-3 inhibitor BIO were observed (n = 3). Data presented as mean ± SEM. Post hoc Dunnett’s test, *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.0001.

Article Snippet: The following antibodies were used for immunocytochemistry studies and immunohistochemistry, Ki67 (1:5000, Abcam, Cambridge, UK; Cat # ab15580), Cleaved Caspase 3 (CC3) (1:100, Cell Signaling Technologies, New England, UK; Cat # D175), ARHGAP12 (1:200, Novus Biologicals, Cambridge, UK; Cat # NBP1-91678), ARHGAP29 (1:100, ATLAS Antibodies, Cambridge, UK; Cat # HPA026534), E-cadherin (1:100, Abcam, Cambridge, UK; Cat # ab1416), N-cadherin (1:100, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Heidelberg, Germany; Cat # Sc-59987), Vimentin (1:200, Abcam, Cambridge, UK; Cat # ab16700), Actin Cytoskeleton/Focal adhesion kit (1:500, Merck, Feltham, UK; Cat # FAK100).

Techniques: Translocation Assay, Labeling, Expressing

Figure 6. Intracranially injected ARHGAP12 and ARHGAP29 kd cells induce tumors with altered morphological features (A–C) Representative mouse brain tissue sections of intracranial tumors from non-target control, ARHGAP12 kd, and ARHGAP29 kd cells with immunohisto- chemical staining (brown) and corresponding column graphs for expression of the following cell markers: (A) vimentin; (B) cleaved caspase-3 (CC3), an apoptosis marker; and (C) Ki67, expressed in proliferating cell nuclei. Black arrowheads indicate different morphological features of the tumor margin. Vimentin scale bar: 150 mm; CC3 and Ki67 scale bars: 75 mm. Data presented as mean ± SEM. (D and E) Both (D) N-cadherin and (E) E-cadherin were strongly expressed on tumor cells in the control group, with a significant loss of N-cadherin expression in ARHGAP12 kd tumors. Scale bar: 75 mm; post hoc Dunnett’s test. Data presented as median, interquartile range, and range.

Journal: Cell reports

Article Title: ARHGAP12 and ARHGAP29 exert distinct regulatory effects on switching between two cell morphological states through GSK-3 activity.

doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2025.115361

Figure Lengend Snippet: Figure 6. Intracranially injected ARHGAP12 and ARHGAP29 kd cells induce tumors with altered morphological features (A–C) Representative mouse brain tissue sections of intracranial tumors from non-target control, ARHGAP12 kd, and ARHGAP29 kd cells with immunohisto- chemical staining (brown) and corresponding column graphs for expression of the following cell markers: (A) vimentin; (B) cleaved caspase-3 (CC3), an apoptosis marker; and (C) Ki67, expressed in proliferating cell nuclei. Black arrowheads indicate different morphological features of the tumor margin. Vimentin scale bar: 150 mm; CC3 and Ki67 scale bars: 75 mm. Data presented as mean ± SEM. (D and E) Both (D) N-cadherin and (E) E-cadherin were strongly expressed on tumor cells in the control group, with a significant loss of N-cadherin expression in ARHGAP12 kd tumors. Scale bar: 75 mm; post hoc Dunnett’s test. Data presented as median, interquartile range, and range.

Article Snippet: The following antibodies were used for immunocytochemistry studies and immunohistochemistry, Ki67 (1:5000, Abcam, Cambridge, UK; Cat # ab15580), Cleaved Caspase 3 (CC3) (1:100, Cell Signaling Technologies, New England, UK; Cat # D175), ARHGAP12 (1:200, Novus Biologicals, Cambridge, UK; Cat # NBP1-91678), ARHGAP29 (1:100, ATLAS Antibodies, Cambridge, UK; Cat # HPA026534), E-cadherin (1:100, Abcam, Cambridge, UK; Cat # ab1416), N-cadherin (1:100, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Heidelberg, Germany; Cat # Sc-59987), Vimentin (1:200, Abcam, Cambridge, UK; Cat # ab16700), Actin Cytoskeleton/Focal adhesion kit (1:500, Merck, Feltham, UK; Cat # FAK100).

Techniques: Injection, Control, Staining, Expressing, Marker

Figure 7. The ARHGAPs regulate glioma cell migration via a novel GSK-3 signaling pathway Targeting GSK-3 activity with a small-molecule inhibitor (1) prevents b-catenin degradation by ubiquitination and (2) promotes b-catenin translocation to the nucleus, where it acts as a transcription factor. Transcription of ARHGAP12 and prevention of transcription of ARHGAP29 lead to changes in Src signaling and/or phosphorylation status of RhoA and Rac1 with (3) concomi- tant adoption of a less aggressive, ameboid phenotype in migratory cells. The phenotypic change in migrating cells may affect recurrence after surgery in patients.

Journal: Cell reports

Article Title: ARHGAP12 and ARHGAP29 exert distinct regulatory effects on switching between two cell morphological states through GSK-3 activity.

doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2025.115361

Figure Lengend Snippet: Figure 7. The ARHGAPs regulate glioma cell migration via a novel GSK-3 signaling pathway Targeting GSK-3 activity with a small-molecule inhibitor (1) prevents b-catenin degradation by ubiquitination and (2) promotes b-catenin translocation to the nucleus, where it acts as a transcription factor. Transcription of ARHGAP12 and prevention of transcription of ARHGAP29 lead to changes in Src signaling and/or phosphorylation status of RhoA and Rac1 with (3) concomi- tant adoption of a less aggressive, ameboid phenotype in migratory cells. The phenotypic change in migrating cells may affect recurrence after surgery in patients.

Article Snippet: The following antibodies were used for immunocytochemistry studies and immunohistochemistry, Ki67 (1:5000, Abcam, Cambridge, UK; Cat # ab15580), Cleaved Caspase 3 (CC3) (1:100, Cell Signaling Technologies, New England, UK; Cat # D175), ARHGAP12 (1:200, Novus Biologicals, Cambridge, UK; Cat # NBP1-91678), ARHGAP29 (1:100, ATLAS Antibodies, Cambridge, UK; Cat # HPA026534), E-cadherin (1:100, Abcam, Cambridge, UK; Cat # ab1416), N-cadherin (1:100, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Heidelberg, Germany; Cat # Sc-59987), Vimentin (1:200, Abcam, Cambridge, UK; Cat # ab16700), Actin Cytoskeleton/Focal adhesion kit (1:500, Merck, Feltham, UK; Cat # FAK100).

Techniques: Migration, Activity Assay, Ubiquitin Proteomics, Translocation Assay, Phospho-proteomics